Dew point: Difference between revisions

From Saltwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:


A well-known approximation used to calculate the dew point, ''T<sub>dp</sub>'', given just the actual ("dry bulb") air temperature, ''T'' and relative humidity (in percent), ''RH'', is the ''Magnus formula'':
A well-known approximation used to calculate the dew point, ''T<sub>dp</sub>'', given just the actual ("dry bulb") air temperature, ''T'' and relative humidity (in percent), ''RH'', is the ''Magnus formula'':
:::<math>\begin{align}
 
<math>
\gamma(T,R\!H)&=\ln\left(\frac{R\!H}{100}\exp\!\!\left(\frac{bT}{c+T}\right)\right)=\ln\left(\frac{R\!H}{100}\right)+\frac{bT}{c+T};\\
\gamma(T,R\!H)&=\ln\left(\frac{R\!H}{100}\exp\!\!\left(\frac{bT}{c+T}\right)\right)=\ln\left(\frac{R\!H}{100}\right)+\frac{bT}{c+T};\\
T_{dp}&= \frac{c\gamma(T,R\!H)}{b-\gamma(T,R\!H)};\end{align}
T_{dp}&= \frac{c\gamma(T,R\!H)}{b-\gamma(T,R\!H)}
</math>
</math>
The more fuller formulation and origin of this approximation involves the interrelated saturated water vapor pressure (in units of bar millibar, which is also hPa at ''T'', ''P<sub>s</sub>''(''T''), and the actual water vapor pressure (also in units of millibar), ''P<sub>a</sub>''(''T''), which can be either found with ''RH'' or approximated with the barometric pressure (in millibar units), ''BP<sub>mb</sub>'', and "wet-bulb" temperature, ''T<sub>w</sub>'' is:
The more fuller formulation and origin of this approximation involves the interrelated saturated water vapor pressure (in units of bar millibar, which is also hPa at ''T'', ''P<sub>s</sub>''(''T''), and the actual water vapor pressure (also in units of millibar), ''P<sub>a</sub>''(''T''), which can be either found with ''RH'' or approximated with the barometric pressure (in millibar units), ''BP<sub>mb</sub>'', and "wet-bulb" temperature, ''T<sub>w</sub>'' is:


:::<small>Note: unless declared otherwise, all temperatures are expressed and worked in degrees Celsius</small>
:::<small>Note: unless declared otherwise, all temperatures are expressed and worked in degrees Celsius</small>
::::<math>
::::<math>
\begin{align}
P_s(T)& = \frac{100}{R\!H}P_\text{a}(T) = a\exp\!\!\left(\frac{bT}{c+T}\right);\\[8pt]
P_s(T)& = \frac{100}{R\!H}P_\text{a}(T) = a\exp\!\!\left(\frac{bT}{c+T}\right);\\[8pt]
P_\text{a}(T) & = \frac{R\!H}{100}P_s(T)=a\exp(\gamma(T,R\!H)),\\
P_\text{a}(T) & = \frac{R\!H}{100}P_s(T)=a\exp(\gamma(T,R\!H)),\\
&\approx P_s(T_\text{w}) - B\!P_\text{mb} 0.00066 \left[1 + (0.00115T_\text{w} \right)]\left(T-T_\text{w}\right);\\[5pt]
&\approx P_s(T_\text{w}) - B\!P_\text{mb} 0.00066 \left[1 + (0.00115T_\text{w} \right)]\left(T-T_\text{w}\right);\\[5pt]
T_\text{dp} & = \frac{c\ln(P_\text{a}(T)/a)}{b-\ln(P_\text{a}(T)/a)};\end{align}</math>
T_\text{dp} & = \frac{c\ln(P_\text{a}(T)/a)}{b-\ln(P_\text{a}(T)/a)}</math>


For greater accuracy, ''P<sub>s</sub>''(''T'') (and, therefore, γ(''T'',''RH'')) can be enhanced, using part of the ''Bögel modification'', also known as the Arden Buck equation, which adds a fourth, ''d'' constant:
For greater accuracy, ''P<sub>s</sub>''(''T'') (and, therefore, γ(''T'',''RH'')) can be enhanced, using part of the ''Bögel modification'', also known as the Arden Buck equation, which adds a fourth, ''d'' constant:
:::<math>\begin{align}P_{s:m}(T)&=a\exp\!\!\bigg(\left(b-\frac{T}{d}\right)\left(\frac{T}{c+T}\right)\bigg);\\[8pt]
 
:::<math>P_{s:m}(T)&=a\exp\!\!\bigg(\left(b-\frac{T}{d}\right)\left(\frac{T}{c+T}\right)\bigg);\\[8pt]
\gamma_m(T,R\!H)&=\ln\Bigg(\frac{R\!H}{100}\exp\!\!
\gamma_m(T,R\!H)&=\ln\Bigg(\frac{R\!H}{100}\exp\!\!
\bigg(\left(b-\frac{T}{d}\right)\left(\frac{T}{c+T}\right)\bigg)
\bigg(\left(b-\frac{T}{d}\right)\left(\frac{T}{c+T}\right)\bigg)
\Bigg);\\
\Bigg);\\
T_{dp}&= \frac{c\gamma_m(T,R\!H)}{b-\gamma_m(T,R\!H)};\end{align}</math>
T_{dp}&= \frac{c\gamma_m(T,R\!H)}{b-\gamma_m(T,R\!H)}</math>
 
:::''(where <math>\scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 18.678;\quad\;c= 257.14^\circ C;\quad\;d=234.5^\circ C.}</math>)''
:::''(where <math>\scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 18.678;\quad\;c= 257.14^\circ C;\quad\;d=234.5^\circ C.}</math>)''


There are several different  constant sets in use, the ones used in NOAA's presentation <ref>http://www.srh.noaa.gov/images/epz/wxcalc/rhTdFromWetBulb.pdf ''Relative Humidity and Dewpoint Temperature from Temperature and Wet-Bulb Temperature''</ref> are taken from a 1980 paper by David Bolton in the ''Monthly Weather Review''<ref>[https://www.rsmas.miami.edu/users/pzuidema/Bolton.pdf "''The computation of equivalent potential temperature''", Monthly Weather Review], vol.108, pg.1047, Eq.10</ref>:
There are several different  constant sets in use, the ones used in NOAA's presentation <ref>http://www.srh.noaa.gov/images/epz/wxcalc/rhTdFromWetBulb.pdf ''Relative Humidity and Dewpoint Temperature from Temperature and Wet-Bulb Temperature''</ref> are taken from a 1980 paper by David Bolton in the ''Monthly Weather Review''<ref>[https://www.rsmas.miami.edu/users/pzuidema/Bolton.pdf "''The computation of equivalent potential temperature''", Monthly Weather Review], vol.108, pg.1047, Eq.10</ref>:
:<math>\begin{align}a&=6.112;\quad\;b&= 17.67;\quad\;c&= 243.5^\circ C;\end{align}</math>
 
:<math>a&=6.112;\quad\;b&= 17.67;\quad\;c&= 243.5^\circ C;</math>
 
These valuations provide a minimum accuracy of 0.1%, for
These valuations provide a minimum accuracy of 0.1%, for
:::::-30°C ≤ ''T'' ≤ +35°C;
:::::-30°C ≤ ''T'' ≤ +35°C;
::::::1% < ''RH'' < 100%;
::::::1% < ''RH'' < 100%;
Also noteworthy is the Sonntag1990,<ref>[http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/~tcs3/tcs3/Misc/Dewpoint_Calculation_Humidity_Sensor_E.pdf SHTxx Application Note Dew-point Calculation]</ref>
Also noteworthy is the Sonntag1990,<ref>[http://irtfweb.ifa.hawaii.edu/~tcs3/tcs3/Misc/Dewpoint_Calculation_Humidity_Sensor_E.pdf SHTxx Application Note Dew-point Calculation]</ref>
:<math>\scriptstyle{a=6.112;\quad\;b= 17.62;\quad\;c= 243.12^\circ C:\quad -45^\circ C\le T\le +60^\circ C\quad (<-0.35^\circ C)}</math>
:<math>\scriptstyle{a=6.112;\quad\;b= 17.62;\quad\;c= 243.12^\circ C:\quad -45^\circ C\le T\le +60^\circ C\quad (<-0.35^\circ C)}</math>
Another common set of values originates from the 1974 ''Psychrometry and Psychrometric Charts'', as presented by '''''Paroscientific''''',<ref>[http://www.paroscientific.com/dewpoint.htm MET4 AND MET4A CALCULATION OF DEW POINT]</ref>
Another common set of values originates from the 1974 ''Psychrometry and Psychrometric Charts'', as presented by '''''Paroscientific''''',<ref>[http://www.paroscientific.com/dewpoint.htm MET4 AND MET4A CALCULATION OF DEW POINT]</ref>
:<math>\scriptstyle{a=6.105;\quad\;b= 17.27;\quad\;c= 237.7^\circ C:\quad 0^\circ C\le T\le +60^\circ C\quad (\pm0.4^\circ C)}</math>
:<math>\scriptstyle{a=6.105;\quad\;b= 17.27;\quad\;c= 237.7^\circ C:\quad 0^\circ C\le T\le +60^\circ C\quad (\pm0.4^\circ C)}</math>
Also, in the ''Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology'',<ref>Buck, A. L. (1981), [http://www.public.iastate.edu/~bkh/teaching/505/arden_buck_sat.pdf "New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor"], J. Appl. Meteorol. 20: 1527–1532</ref> Arden Buck presents several different valuation sets, with different minimum accuracies for different temperature ranges.  Two particular sets provide a range of -40°C → +50°C between the two, with even greater minimum accuracy than all of the other, above sets (maximum error at given |C°| extreme):
Also, in the ''Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology'',<ref>Buck, A. L. (1981), [http://www.public.iastate.edu/~bkh/teaching/505/arden_buck_sat.pdf "New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor"], J. Appl. Meteorol. 20: 1527–1532</ref> Arden Buck presents several different valuation sets, with different minimum accuracies for different temperature ranges.  Two particular sets provide a range of -40°C → +50°C between the two, with even greater minimum accuracy than all of the other, above sets (maximum error at given |C°| extreme):
:<math>\scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 17.368;\quad\;c= 238.88^\circ C:\quad\quad\! 0^\circ C\le T\le +50^\circ C\;\;(\le0.05%)}</math>
:<math>\scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 17.368;\quad\;c= 238.88^\circ C:\quad\quad\! 0^\circ C\le T\le +50^\circ C\;\;(\le0.05%)}</math>
:<math>\scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 17.966;\quad\;c= 247.15^\circ C:\quad -40^\circ C\le T\le 0^\circ C\quad\! \;\;(\le0.06%)}</math>
:<math>\scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 17.966;\quad\;c= 247.15^\circ C:\quad -40^\circ C\le T\le 0^\circ C\quad\! \;\;(\le0.06%)}</math>


===Simple approximation===
===Simple approximation===
There is also a very simple approximation that allows conversion between the dew point, temperature and relative humidity.  This approach is accurate to within about ±1°C as long as the relative humidity is above 50%:
There is also a very simple approximation that allows conversion between the dew point, temperature and relative humidity.  This approach is accurate to within about ±1°C as long as the relative humidity is above 50%:
:<math>T_{dp}\approx T-\frac{100-R\!H}{5};</math>
:<math>T_{dp}\approx T-\frac{100-R\!H}{5};</math>
and
and
:<math>R\!H\approx 100-5(T-T_{dp});\,</math>
:<math>R\!H\approx 100-5(T-T_{dp});\,</math>


Line 80: Line 95:


For temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit, these approximations work out to
For temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit, these approximations work out to
:<math> T_{dp:f}\approx T_{f}-\frac{9}{25}(100-R\!H);</math>
:<math> T_{dp:f}\approx T_{f}-\frac{9}{25}(100-R\!H);</math>
and
and

Revision as of 10:17, 20 November 2013

back to Measured Variables

This page contains contents from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dew_point (28.10.2012)

it is therefore released under the licence: „Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike“



with contributions by Sandra Leithäuser

Dew point[edit]

Figure 1 Phase transition of water
(Wasser-Water; Eis-Ice; Wasserdampf-Water vapor; Druck-Pressure; Kritischer Punkt-Critical point; Tripelpunkt- Triple point)


Figure 2 Maximum water vapor concentration as a function of temperature


The dew point is the temperature below which the water vapor in a volume of humid air at a constant barometric pressure will condense into liquid water. Condensed water is called dew when it forms on a solid surface.

The dew point is a water-to-air saturation temperature. The dew point is associated with relative humidity. A high relative humidity indicates that the dew point is closer to the current air temperature. Relative humidity of 100% indicates the dew point is equal to the current temperature and that the air is maximally saturated with water. When the dew point remains constant and temperature increases, relative humidity decreases.[1]

At a given temperature but independent of barometric pressure, the dew point is a consequence of the absolute humidity, the mass of water per unit volume of air. If both the temperature and pressure rise, however, the dew point will rise and the relative humidity will lower accordingly. Reducing the absolute humidity without changing other variables will bring the dew point back down to its initial value. In the same way, increasing the absolute humidity after a temperature drop brings the dew point back down to its initial level. If the temperature rises in conditions of constant pressure, then the dew point will remain constant but the relative humidity will drop. For this reason, a constant relative humidity (%) with different temperatures implies that when it's hotter, a higher fraction of the air is water vapor than when it's cooler.

At a given barometric pressure but independent of temperature, the dew point indicates the mole fraction of water vapor in the air, or, put differently, determines the specific humidity of the air. If the pressure rises without changing this mole fraction, the dew point will rise accordingly; Reducing the mole fraction, i.e., making the air less humid, would bring the dew point back down to its initial value. In the same way, increasing the mole fraction after a pressure drop brings the relative humidity back up to its initial level. Considering New York (33 ft elevation) and Denver (5,280 ft elevation),[2] for example, this means that if the dew point and temperature in both cities are the same, then the mass of water vapor per cubic meter of air will be the same, but the mole fraction of water vapor in the air will be greater in Denver.

Measurement[edit]

Devices called dew point meters are used to measure the dew point over a wide range of temperatures. These devices consist of a polished metal mirror which is cooled as air is passed over it. The temperature at which dew forms is, by definition, the dew point. Manual devices of this sort can be used to calibrate other types of humidity sensors, and automatic sensors may be used in a control loop with a humidifier or dehumidifier to control the dew point of the air in a building or in a smaller space for a manufacturing process.

See Moisture measurement methods for more detail.

Calculating the dew point[edit]

A well-known approximation used to calculate the dew point, Tdp, given just the actual ("dry bulb") air temperature, T and relative humidity (in percent), RH, is the Magnus formula:

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \gamma(T,R\!H)&=\ln\left(\frac{R\!H}{100}\exp\!\!\left(\frac{bT}{c+T}\right)\right)=\ln\left(\frac{R\!H}{100}\right)+\frac{bT}{c+T};\\ T_{dp}&= \frac{c\gamma(T,R\!H)}{b-\gamma(T,R\!H)} }

The more fuller formulation and origin of this approximation involves the interrelated saturated water vapor pressure (in units of bar millibar, which is also hPa at T, Ps(T), and the actual water vapor pressure (also in units of millibar), Pa(T), which can be either found with RH or approximated with the barometric pressure (in millibar units), BPmb, and "wet-bulb" temperature, Tw is:

Note: unless declared otherwise, all temperatures are expressed and worked in degrees Celsius
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle P_s(T)& = \frac{100}{R\!H}P_\text{a}(T) = a\exp\!\!\left(\frac{bT}{c+T}\right);\\[8pt] P_\text{a}(T) & = \frac{R\!H}{100}P_s(T)=a\exp(\gamma(T,R\!H)),\\ &\approx P_s(T_\text{w}) - B\!P_\text{mb} 0.00066 \left[1 + (0.00115T_\text{w} \right)]\left(T-T_\text{w}\right);\\[5pt] T_\text{dp} & = \frac{c\ln(P_\text{a}(T)/a)}{b-\ln(P_\text{a}(T)/a)}}

For greater accuracy, Ps(T) (and, therefore, γ(T,RH)) can be enhanced, using part of the Bögel modification, also known as the Arden Buck equation, which adds a fourth, d constant:

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle P_{s:m}(T)&=a\exp\!\!\bigg(\left(b-\frac{T}{d}\right)\left(\frac{T}{c+T}\right)\bigg);\\[8pt] \gamma_m(T,R\!H)&=\ln\Bigg(\frac{R\!H}{100}\exp\!\! \bigg(\left(b-\frac{T}{d}\right)\left(\frac{T}{c+T}\right)\bigg) \Bigg);\\ T_{dp}&= \frac{c\gamma_m(T,R\!H)}{b-\gamma_m(T,R\!H)}}
(where Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 18.678;\quad\;c= 257.14^\circ C;\quad\;d=234.5^\circ C.}} )

There are several different constant sets in use, the ones used in NOAA's presentation [3] are taken from a 1980 paper by David Bolton in the Monthly Weather Review[4]:

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle a&=6.112;\quad\;b&= 17.67;\quad\;c&= 243.5^\circ C;}

These valuations provide a minimum accuracy of 0.1%, for

-30°C ≤ T ≤ +35°C;
1% < RH < 100%;

Also noteworthy is the Sonntag1990,[5]

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \scriptstyle{a=6.112;\quad\;b= 17.62;\quad\;c= 243.12^\circ C:\quad -45^\circ C\le T\le +60^\circ C\quad (<-0.35^\circ C)}}

Another common set of values originates from the 1974 Psychrometry and Psychrometric Charts, as presented by Paroscientific,[6]

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \scriptstyle{a=6.105;\quad\;b= 17.27;\quad\;c= 237.7^\circ C:\quad 0^\circ C\le T\le +60^\circ C\quad (\pm0.4^\circ C)}}

Also, in the Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology,[7] Arden Buck presents several different valuation sets, with different minimum accuracies for different temperature ranges. Two particular sets provide a range of -40°C → +50°C between the two, with even greater minimum accuracy than all of the other, above sets (maximum error at given |C°| extreme):

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 17.368;\quad\;c= 238.88^\circ C:\quad\quad\! 0^\circ C\le T\le +50^\circ C\;\;(\le0.05%)}}
Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \scriptstyle{a=6.1121;\quad\;b= 17.966;\quad\;c= 247.15^\circ C:\quad -40^\circ C\le T\le 0^\circ C\quad\! \;\;(\le0.06%)}}

Simple approximation[edit]

There is also a very simple approximation that allows conversion between the dew point, temperature and relative humidity. This approach is accurate to within about ±1°C as long as the relative humidity is above 50%:

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle T_{dp}\approx T-\frac{100-R\!H}{5};}

and

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle R\!H\approx 100-5(T-T_{dp});\,}

This can be expressed as a simple rule of thumb:

For every 1°C difference in the dew point and dry bulb temperatures, the relative humidity decreases by 5%, starting with RH = 100% when the dew point equals the dry bulb temperature.

The derivation of this approach, a discussion of its accuracy, comparisons to other approximations, and more information on the history and applications of the dew point are given in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society.[8]

For temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit, these approximations work out to

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle T_{dp:f}\approx T_{f}-\frac{9}{25}(100-R\!H);}

and

Failed to parse (SVG (MathML can be enabled via browser plugin): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle R\!H\approx 100-\frac{25}{9}(T_{f}-T_{dp:f});}

For example, a relative humidity of 100% means dew point is the same as air temp. For 90% RH, dew point is 3 degrees Fahrenheit lower than air temp. For every 10 percent lower, dew point drops 3 °F.

Frost point[edit]

The frost point is similar to the dew point, in that it is the temperature to which a given parcel of humid air must be cooled, at constant barometric pressure, for water vapor to be deposited on a surface as ice without going through the liquid phase. The frost point for a given parcel of air is always higher than the dew point, as the stronger bonding between water molecules on the surface of ice requires higher temperature to break.[9]

References[edit]

  1. Steve Horstmeyer, Meteorologist http://www.shorstmeyer.com/wxfaqs/humidity/humidity.html accessdate 2009-08-20
  2. http://www.denvergov.org/AboutDenver/today_factsguide.asp, access date March 19, 2007
  3. http://www.srh.noaa.gov/images/epz/wxcalc/rhTdFromWetBulb.pdf Relative Humidity and Dewpoint Temperature from Temperature and Wet-Bulb Temperature
  4. "The computation of equivalent potential temperature", Monthly Weather Review, vol.108, pg.1047, Eq.10
  5. SHTxx Application Note Dew-point Calculation
  6. MET4 AND MET4A CALCULATION OF DEW POINT
  7. Buck, A. L. (1981), "New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor", J. Appl. Meteorol. 20: 1527–1532
  8. M. G. Lawrence, "The relationship between relative humidity and the dew point temperature in moist air: A simple conversion and applications", Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 225–233, 2005
  9. http://www.theweatherprediction.com/habyhints/347/, Frost point and dew point accessdate: September 30, 2011, Author: Haby, Jeff

External links[edit]